In any society there are truths that are so powerful, so dangerous to the established order, that they must be repressed at all costs. In the twenty-first century AD, we can recognise these truths by observing what is censored by the most powerful bureaucracies of our day—not our pitifully weak state governments, but the trans-national tech and media conglomerates that control our governments and our lives. These are the truths I have spoken that were too dangerous to be allowed to exist, and were therefore censored. I will record here all of my bannable offences from May 2021 onwards.
There is a noticeable trend in the truths that the powerful will not allow to be spoken: they prohibit statements that expose their lies about the identity groups that they fetishise, and that are destroying the civilised order. The extreme violence and sub-normal intelligence of beasts like Evil George Floyd are throwing society into crisis. The degeneracy of trans-sexuals is both caused by and contributing to the collapse of the family, the best institution known for promoting the well-being of children. These are the anti-social groups that the powerful are trying to protect and promote.
This prioritisation of identity groups' whims over real objective truth and the good of humanity as a whole is part of the disastrous secular religion of identity politics, also known as so-called “social justice”, or originally from the patois of the semi-literate, “woke”. Indeed, anyone who has been active in defending the truth knows that we have reached a point where the simple, innocent statement that one wants to find truth, or support reality, is enough to bring down an avalanche of hysterical denunciations on one's head.
“Glorifying Violence”
“Evil George Floyd wasn't murdered. He committed accidental suicide of an overdose.”
There was no way in which this could have been considered “glorifying violence”. Violence was specifically rejected as an explanation for the death of Evil George Floyd. How could I glorify something I don't think happened? One could of course disagree with the statement on the merits, and such a debate would be welcome. But note that there was no attempt made to pretend that what I had said was untrue, only that it “glorified” violence in some unexplained way. There must be very few remaining who truly believe that Evil George Floyd was supposedly “murdered”, after all the evidence of his drug abuse, and of the infiltration of the jury by supporters of the BLM terror network. Their only riposte to maintain the fake founding martyrdom of their cult is to suggest that the truth is unpalatable, and therefore unspeakable.
“Abuse and Harassment”
“A man chopping his dick off and getting boob implants would no more make him a woman, than painting black stripes on himself and neighing would make him a zebra.”
No one was abused or harassed by this statement. It was not made to a tranny; no tranny was involved in the conversation. There was no persistent contact that could justify the term “harassment”. Moreover, even if the statement had been made to a tranny, it may be considered to be a harsh truth, but it is ultimately only a truth. One could try to disagree with the statement on the merits (though it is extremely hard to see how). But no attempt is made to pretend that the statement is untrue, only that it is unpalatable, and therefore unspeakable.
sum θoətiz abaʊt unspiikəbəl trʊʊθiz
in enii səsaiətii ðeə bii trʊʊθiz ðat bii soʊ paʊwəfəl, soʊ deinjərəs tə ðiiy istabliʃəð ʊədə, ðat dii must bii represəð at oəl kostiz. in ðə tʊʊ-dein umθ sencəriiy a.d., wii kan rekəgnaiz diiz trʊʊθiz baiy obzuəviŋg wot bii sensərəð bai ðə moʊst paʊwəfəl byʊərokrisiiyiz ov wiis dei—not wiis pitifəlii wiik steit guvənməntiz, but ðə tranznaʃənəl tek and miidyə konglomərətiz ðat kontroʊl wiis guvənməntiz and wiis laifiz. ðiiz bii ðə trʊʊθiz mii spiikiv ðat biiyid tʊʊ deinjərəs tə biiy alaʊwəð tʊʊw egzist, and biiyid ðeəfoə sensərəð. mii rikʊədil hiər oəl ov miis banəbəl ofensiz from mei 2021 onwəd.
ðeə biiy a noʊtisəbəl trend in ðə trʊʊθiz ðat ðə paʊwəfəl alaʊwil not tə bii spiikəð: dii proʊhibit steitməntiz ðat ekspoʊz diis laiyiz abaʊt ðiiy aidentitii grʊʊpiz ðat dii fetiʃaiz, and ðat distroiyin ðə sivilaizəð ʊədə. ðiiy ekstriim vaiələns and sub-noəməl intelijəns ov biistiz laik iivil joəj floid θroʊwin səsaiətiiy intə kraisis. ðə dijenərəsiiy ov tranz-sekʃʊʊwəliz both bii kʊəzəð baiy and kontribyʊʊtin tə ðə kəlaps ov ðə familii, ðə best insticʊʊʃən noʊwəð foə prəmoʊtiŋ ðə wel-biiyiŋg ov caildiz. ðiiz bii ðiiy antii-soʊʃəl grʊʊpiz ðat ðə paʊwufəl traiyin tə prətekt and prəmoʊt.
ðis praiyoritizeiʃən ov aidentitii grʊʊpiz-iis wimiz oʊvə riil objektiv trʊʊθ and ðə gʊd ov hyʊʊmanitiiy az a hoʊl bii paət ov ðə dizastrəs sekyələ rilijən ov aidentitii politiks, oəlsoʊ noʊwəð az soʊ-koələð “soʊʃəl justis”, oər ərijinəlii from ðə patwaər ov ðə semiii-litərət, “woʊk”. indiid, eniiyum hʊʊ biiyiv aktiv in difendiŋ ðə trʊʊθ noʊ ðat wii riiciv a point weə ðə simpəl, inəsənt steitmənt ðat um wont tə faind trʊʊθ, oə səpʊət riiyalitii, bii inuf tə briŋ daʊn an avalanc ov histerikəl dinunsiiyeiʃəniz on um-iis hed.
“glʊərifaiyiŋ vaiələns”
“iivil joəj floid biiyid not muədərəð. hii kəmitid aksidentəl sʊʊwisaid ov an oʊvədoʊs.”
ðeə biiyid noʊ weiy in wic ðis kʊd biiyiv kənsidərəð “glʊərifaiyiŋ vaiələns”. vaiələns biiyid spisifiklii rijektəð az an ekspləneiʃən foə ðə deθ ov iivil joəj floid. kwes mii kʊd glʊərifai sumθiŋ mii θink not hapənid haʊw? um kʊd ov koəs disagrii wið ðə steitmənt on ðə meritiz, and suc a dibeit wʊd bii welkəm. but noʊt ðat ðeə biiyid noʊw atemt meikəð tə pritend ðat wot mii seiyivid biiyid untrʊʊw, oʊnlii ðat ðis “glʊərifaiyid” vaiələns in sum unekspleinəð wei. ðeə must bii verii fyʊʊ rimeiniŋg hʊʊ trʊʊlii biliiv ðat iivil joəj floid biiyid supoʊzəðlii “muədərəð”, aftər oəl ðiiy evidəns ov hiis drug abyʊʊs, and ov ðiiy infiltreiʃən ov ðə jyʊərii bai supʊətəriz ov ðə b.l.m. terə netwuək. diis oʊnlii ripost tə meintein ðə feik faʊndiŋ maətədəm ov diis kult bii tə səjest ðat ðə trʊʊθ biiy unpalatəbəl, and ðeəfoə unspiikəbəl.
“abyʊʊs and harasmənt”
“a man copiŋg hiis dik of and getiŋ bʊʊb implantiz wʊd noʊ mʊə meik hii a wʊmən, ðan peintiŋ blak straipiz on hiiself and neiyiŋg wʊd meik hiiy a zebrə.”
noʊw-um biiyid abyʊʊsəð oə harasəð bai ðis steitmənt. ðis biiyid not meikəð tʊʊw a tranii; noʊ tranii biiyid involvəð in ðə konvəseiʃən. ðeə biiyid noʊ pəsistənt kontakt ðat kʊd justifai ðə tuəm “harasmənt”. mʊəroʊvə, iivən if ðə steitmənt biiyivid meikəð tʊʊw a tranii, ðat mei bii kənsidərəð tə biiy a harʃ trʊʊθ, but ðat biiy ultimətliiy oʊnliiy a trʊʊθ. um kʊd trai tə disagrii wið ðə steitmənt on ðə meritiz (ðoʊ ðis biiy ekstriimlii haəd tə sii haʊ). but noʊ atemt bii meikəð tə pritend ðat ðə steitmənt biiy untrʊʊ, oʊnlii ðat ðis biiy unpalatəbəl, and ðeəfoə unspiikəbəl.